What's disturbing about many so-called experts is how fragile their reasoning is. There are people out there proclaiming their theories, ideas, plans are firm as concrete when they're as weak as the minds of the people who swallow the audio excrement pumped out by the so-called leaders.
"Well, it SOUNDS good!"
Here's an example.
How weak is the argument, "God won't let the Earth burn up?" It's so frakkin' weak that it's an old joke!
This completely ignores the whole free will deal - if we're Hell bent and determined to destroy the Earth, God isn't preempting The Sopranos/C.S.I. and Grey's Anatomy with An Inconvenient Truth. He/She isn't going to change the litter we throw away into roses and trees in a sweet-smelling puff of smoke, Ip isn't going to make a giant thermometer emblazoned with WWJD? (and if there is ever a Second Coming, Jesus is gonna sue someone for copyright infringement) pop up in the sky showing just how much we've overheated the Earth. Ain't gonna happen.
Keeping in the religious vein, it's almost miraculous in a negative sense just how craven and egotistic that "reason" is.
At one and the same time, it states "We are so important to God that we will be saved from our mistakes!" and "God will save us since we can't do it ourselves." We're so stupid in our importance God will HAVE to save us!
I've seen better arguments floating in alphabet soup.
Though it DOES say a lot about some religious righties out there. They've been Chosen - and they are unanimous in this.