Try to believe this one: (from DefCon)
The policy also prohibits students and teachers from discussing intelligent design in class after the statement is read.
Said policy being the one where:
The school board voted a year ago to require students to hear a statement about intelligent design before ninth-grade biology lessons on evolution. The statement says Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact," has inexplicable "gaps," and refers students to a textbook, "Of Pandas and People," for more information.
So, to expose kids to "different schools of thought" (a common IDiotic claim), you mention it as an alternative to evolution, and then you refuse to allow any debate on it? Or questions? Or arguments? This isn't scientific exposure, it's the equivalent of a flasher's indecent exposure!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment